Review the articles, resolution subject and majority together.
Put the relevant clause, notice and voting requirement into one resolution file.
How an Austrian GmbH retains balance-sheet profit: the allocation resolution, distribution block and minority protection.
Austrian GmbH shareholders do not automatically have to receive a distribution of every balance-sheet profit. Section 82 GmbHG allows the articles of association or a shareholder resolution to exclude profit from distribution. The resolution needs a clear subject, a sound reason and an equal rule for the shareholders concerned.
This article addresses retention of profit in the allocation resolution. Calculating balance-sheet profit, hidden distributions and a distribution that has already been approved require a separate review.
Select your situation. The result indicates which resolution and contract documents should be reviewed together first.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
Put the relevant clause, notice and voting requirement into one resolution file.
Draft the resolution with the relevant accounts, amount, purpose and retention period.
Document the financing need and state the exact decision the shareholders are taking.
Compare shareholding ratios, the allocation decision and any different treatment of an individual shareholder.
Collect notice, agenda, proxies, voting record and minutes in chronological order.
Section 82(1) GmbHG links the shareholders’ claim to the balance-sheet profit shown after the annual accounts. The articles of association or a shareholder resolution can exclude that profit from distribution. The provision therefore allows the shareholders to decide how the profit is used within the company.
Under section 82(2) GmbHG, distribution follows the ratio of paid-in capital contributions unless the articles contain a special rule. A distribution block has a different effect: the relevant amount stays with the GmbH and is not allocated to individual shareholders according to their ratio.
The resolution does not replace the calculation of profit. It presupposes annual accounts and a balance-sheet profit derived from those accounts. The arithmetic basis remains outside this article.
The resolution should identify the relevant annual accounts, the balance-sheet profit under consideration and the amount to be distributed or retained. A sentence such as “The profit will not be distributed for the time being” leaves the scope unclear. It may refer to the whole profit, a partial amount or only a later payment date.
A full retention should state the retained amount and the reason for the decision. An investment programme, agreed financing or a business reserve may explain the choice. The reason does not replace the resolution and cannot conceal an unrelated benefit for one shareholder.
A partial allocation also needs a clear calculation basis. The distributed amount must be separated from the amount remaining in the GmbH. That makes the decision and any later claim easier to reconstruct.
The articles may contain their own rules on profit allocation. Review distribution reservations, reserve clauses, consent requirements and provisions granting special shareholder rights. A clause should be read together with every other provision that affects the decision route.
A financing agreement may restrict distributions until certain figures are reached or during an investment phase. That obligation must be kept distinct from the corporate resolution. The GmbH still needs a valid allocation resolution, and a reference to a bank covenant does not replace it.
The overview on reviewing articles of association provides the broader contract framework. The overview on capital changes and dilution covers the related financing and capital-binding questions.
A single distribution block applying to the relevant profit initially uses the same rule for the shareholders. The risk changes where people in the same position are treated differently or one shareholder receives an economic advantage connected with the retained profit.
The shareholding ratio remains relevant to a later distribution. Section 82(2) GmbHG provides the default ratio based on paid-in capital contributions. A retention should therefore make clear whether it covers the full profit or whether a separate preferential allocation is intended.
The overview on shareholder and voting rights explains majority, blocking minorities and information rights. The checklist on voting rights and majorities supports the practical preparation.
A commercially understandable retention can still be affected by a defective resolution route. Notice, agenda, attendance, representation, voting basis and minutes must fit the articles and the statute. The announced subject should allow shareholders to understand the economic significance of the decision.
When a shareholder objects, identify the exact issue first. Is the dispute about the basis for retention, the required majority, an unclear amount or unequal treatment? That distinction determines whether a fresh resolution could correct the issue or whether a challenge or nullity question needs closer review.
The checklist for reviewing articles supports the initial document review. If the articles are to be amended, compare the resolution file with the amendment preparation checklist.
The relevant articles, approved annual accounts, resolution proposal, notice and agenda belong together. If financing is involved, add the facility agreement, relevant figures, investment plan and correspondence with the financing partner.
The minutes should record the wording, the balance-sheet profit considered, the distributed amount, the retained amount and the voting result. Later emails may explain the background, but they should not have to repair an unclear resolution.
You can subscribe to BRANDaktuellen Rechtsnews for ongoing updates on company law. A concrete resolution should be reviewed together with the articles, annual accounts and complete resolution file.
Section 82(1) GmbHG expressly names a shareholder resolution, alongside the articles, as a basis for excluding balance-sheet profit from distribution. The specific majority and resolution route depend on the statute and the articles.
A single retention of the resolved profit generally applies by the same rule to everyone concerned. A different benefit or special treatment of one shareholder requires separate review and a sound contractual and factual basis.
No. The financing need may explain why the company retains profit. The GmbH still needs a clear resolution identifying the annual accounts, balance-sheet profit and actual allocation decision.
Review and structure GmbH articles with Brandauer Rechtsanwälte in Austria.
Contact