Prokura in an OG: Consent, urgency and revocation
How an Austrian OG agreement should organise consent to prokura, urgent cases, express grant, revocation and Firmenbuch filing.
In an Austrian general partnership, the partnership agreement should map the steps leading to a prokura: who is authorised to manage the business, who must consent, what happens in an urgent case and how a grant or revocation is documented. Section 116(3) UGB generally requires the consent of all partners authorised to manage the business before a prokurist is appointed. It provides an exception where there is imminent danger in delay. The prokura itself must be expressly granted under section 48 UGB. It may be revoked at any time under section 52 UGB, while its grant, amendment and termination must be filed with the Firmenbuch under section 53 UGB. These steps should form one coordinated record.
Which prokura step is open in your OG?
Choose the situation. The result shows which documents and which agreement rule should be checked first.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
What needs to be organised in the OG?
Overview of all answers.
A prokura requires an express declaration under section 48 UGB. Record the person, start date and declaration in a separate document.
The Firmenbuch filing should follow the signed grant. Keep the resolution, declaration and filing receipt together.
Describe the concrete imminent danger in delay and the action that could not wait. Mere convenience is not enough.
The later record should connect the urgent reason, the action taken and the persons involved.
Check whether the agreement has a clear record-keeping rule for urgent cases. It should reflect the statutory framework rather than create a blanket exception.
Record authority, revocation, and receipt as separate points in time. A prokura revocation is distinct from ending an employment or service relationship.
Arrange the filing of the termination under section 53(3) UGB and keep the filing receipt.
Separate revocation from the operational handover: bank access, documents, communication and pending matters need their own list.
Who must consent to prokura in an OG
Section 116(3) UGB generally requires the consent of all partners authorised to manage the business when a prokurist is appointed. The decisive point is the actual management authority. A person’s participation in the OG or an informal role as contact person does not answer that question by itself.
The agreement should state who is authorised to manage, how consent is recorded and which documents prove the resolution. The person concerned, the intended start and the express grant should be identifiable. This prevents an operational assignment from being mistaken for a prokura declaration.
How the agreement should deal with imminent danger in delay
Section 116(3) UGB provides an exception for imminent danger in delay. The agreement should not turn every convenient short deadline into an exception. It should require a concrete reason, the action that could not wait and a later record of the decision.
The file should connect the reason, time, business relationship and explanation for immediate action. Later documentation does not replace the statutory requirement. It makes clear why the ordinary consent process could not be completed in time.
Why a resolution and an express grant are separate
Section 48 UGB requires an express grant of prokura. A partners’ resolution and the declaration addressed to the prokurist therefore serve different purposes: the resolution records internal consent, while the declaration grants the commercial authority.
The agreement should show both steps and name the person responsible for the declaration. A task description, bank authorisation or notice of future responsibilities should not replace an express prokura declaration.
Which records the OG agreement should require
A workable clause can describe application, resolution, grant and filing. The application may state the reason and intended role. The resolution should identify the consenting partners and result. The grant should be a separate dated and signed declaration.
For an urgent case, the file should also contain the facts supporting the urgency. The agreement may require prompt information of the other managing partners and later documentation. That organisational rule supports evidence but does not decide whether the statutory exception existed.
How to prepare a revocation
Section 52 UGB makes prokura revocable at any time. The agreement should therefore identify who issues the revocation, how it is recorded and who coordinates information to the former prokurist, banks and relevant contractual contacts.
Revocation and ending an employment or service relationship are separate events. Record the declaration, receipt, and the securing of documents and access rights. This makes the end of the prokura and the following organisational steps traceable.
How grant and termination reach the Firmenbuch
Section 53 UGB requires the grant and termination of prokura to be filed with the Firmenbuch. The agreement should allocate responsibility for the filing and require the receipt to be kept in the file.
When prokura changes, the resolution, express declaration or revocation and filing should form a consistent timeline. After registration, compare the current Firmenbuch extract with the internal records.
How to create one consistent process
A reliable process links six checks: management authority, consent or a documented urgent case, express grant or revocation, information of affected persons, Firmenbuch filing and retention of proof. Each stage should have a responsible person and a document.
For a review, prepare the current agreement and amendments, a Firmenbuch extract, prior resolutions, grants or revocations and the proposed clause. The firm can then align the rule with the OG and identify missing records.
Frequently asked questions about prokura in an OG
Is a partners’ resolution enough for prokura?
No. The resolution records internal consent. Prokura must also be expressly granted under section 48 UGB, followed by the section 53 UGB filing.
When can the consent of all managing partners be omitted?
Section 116(3) UGB provides an exception where there is imminent danger in delay. The case must be concrete. The agreement should organise the reason, immediate action and later record.
Can prokura be revoked together with an employment contract?
Revocation of prokura is distinct from ending an employment or service relationship. Record both events separately, with their own timing and documents.
Who files the termination of prokura?
The agreement should allocate the filing task to a responsible person. Section 53(3) UGB concerns termination. Keep the filing receipt with the records.
Which documents should the agreement provide for?
Useful records include the application, consent resolution, express grant or revocation, proof of receipt, notices and Firmenbuch filing. Add the reasons for urgency where relevant.
For the next agreement decision
For the review, use the pages on management and representation and the agreement checklist. New articles and legal updates are available through BRANDaktuelle Rechtsnews.
Book an initial consultation (€180)
Review and structure GmbH articles with Brandauer Rechtsanwälte in Austria.
Contact